Redwall: Warlords

Discussion => Reg Discussion => Topic started by: Rakefur on April 24, 2012, 10:50:33 AM

Title: Takedown
Post by: Rakefur on April 24, 2012, 10:50:33 AM
Nice work Shadow. My clan put the net on me...and I couldn't get on this week!

How much net did we have before? Just wondering :/
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Gen. Volkov on April 24, 2012, 03:39:20 PM
About 1.9 bil. We did it because of Sevah's actions, by the way. If you guys want to have him in your clan, fine, but you have to deal with the consequences. This is the second time he's tried to kill Shadow, and killed all the net that was on Shadow in the process.

We got tired of dealing with it, so takedown time. It's pretty sad that four guys came after Shadow and couldn't manage the kill. I'm sure Sevah and Co will try again. In the meantime, Shield will be removing WAR from the top ten. I suggest you do something about Sevah, then we won't have to annihilate your clan.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Wolf Snare on April 24, 2012, 05:12:08 PM
lol STFU volkov. constantly e tuffing like you're something special. we ruined your NW, you ruined ours. who gives a [poop]? Quit riding the coattails of your teammates so you can act gnarly (yet again, emperor volkov), then you can open your yap. Oh, and if we wanted to kill him, he would have died-- ask his third turbo account.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Shadow on April 24, 2012, 06:30:13 PM
No, you guys really did fail two kills on reg. Health buff makes it easy on turbo, hence your success there.

Can you please not make this personal? Volkov's post was quite neutral.

Anyway yes, Rakefur, we took you down cause your clan has been trying to kill me/murder our net. Sorry if you weren't involved directly.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Wolf Snare on April 24, 2012, 06:38:17 PM
Believe me, if I was involved in killing you it would have been carried out. Volk is busy acting macho throwing his big bad words around, I don't have to listen to it.... you guys suck.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Rakefur on April 24, 2012, 07:12:27 PM
I wasn't on the last 2 weeks, so last time I saw you you had like 200 mil net.  :P
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Shadow on April 24, 2012, 07:20:05 PM
Quote from: Wolf Snare on April 24, 2012, 06:38:17 PM
Believe me, if I was involved in killing you it would have been carried out. Volk is busy acting macho throwing his big bad words around, I don't have to listen to it.... you guys suck.
you were involved, your standards are all over my news feed. 5 of you were involved in suicides, murders, and standards.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Wolf Snare on April 24, 2012, 07:26:27 PM
lol, that was just me pwning you from 500m nw to 150. if I was going to kill you, I'd go at you with full turns, not 200; just wanted to knock you down fully. Dont say I failed when I didn't ;)
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Durza on April 24, 2012, 08:30:11 PM
Consider it like this, the game has entered a "reset" of NW.  No one person now holds a billion NW.

And at the end of the day, this still remains a game.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Shadow on April 24, 2012, 08:48:39 PM
Quote from: Durza on April 24, 2012, 08:30:11 PM
Consider it like this, the game has entered a "reset" of NW.  No one person now holds a billion NW.
more or less my thoughts

though the market is pretty full still
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Gen. Volkov on April 25, 2012, 04:21:42 AM
Quotelol STFU volkov. constantly e tuffing like you're something special. we ruined your NW, you ruined ours. who gives a [poop]? Quit riding the coattails of your teammates so you can act gnarly (yet again, emperor volkov), then you can open your yap. Oh, and if we wanted to kill him, he would have died-- ask his third turbo account.

You're funny Snare.

Though I'm a little confused, when did I act "gnarly" when I was emp? All I ever did was tell Sevah not to get cocky (which he did, and then the rest of the game ganged up on us), and make "declarations" which you and everyone thought were hilarious. You can make these ridiculous accusations all you want, I guess, but that doesn't make them true. They are pretty funny though, since you were way more of a internet tough guy here than I was. LOL.

Quotelol, that was just me pwning you from 500m nw to 150. if I was going to kill you, I'd go at you with full turns, not 200; just wanted to knock you down fully. Dont say I failed when I didn't

He didn't say you failed, he said your team failed. He was on 693 land. That's a kill attempt by any reckoning. Especially since you could have accomplished the same thing with murders, without blowing all your troops killing his. You guys failed a kill, don't sit there and lie about it, just man up, admit it, and move on.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Shadow Assassin on April 25, 2012, 04:35:26 AM
lol it wasn't a kill attempt :) we just tried to take down your net and we achieved that goal.
Want me to prove it to you?
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Gen. Volkov on April 25, 2012, 04:37:41 AM
Could have achieved it more easily and simply in other ways. If you are going to try to "prove" it too me by trying to kill me, that would be silly. If you can prove in some other way that the attack on Shadow was in fact not a kill attempt, be my guest.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Night Wolf on April 25, 2012, 01:29:01 PM
It wasnt a kill attempt because they failed obviously
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Gen. Volkov on April 25, 2012, 01:41:44 PM
Maybe you all should have told Sevah that you were going to lie about trying to kill Shadow, before you came on the forums lying about it. :)
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Wolf Snare on April 25, 2012, 01:51:32 PM
Yeah, your mass messages were mildly funny. But you also betrayed the team that made you emperor and gave them no recognition the entire time. I can't even remember how many times throughout that span of a few months that you ran out of food or forget to raise defenses; you were counterproductive. Now once again you're smack talking because your new clan is carrying you through. How long til you flipflop again?

I back it up when I gloat, I don't just start talking crap like that:

"Shield will be removing WAR from the top ten. blah blah blah"
"it's takedown time. blahblah"

Just cut out your insufferable whining and bragging, it's always one or the other.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Shadow on April 25, 2012, 02:16:11 PM
When have we not backed up threats? Since we started going after TEMPLE we've been pretty successful, both on my own initially, then with Holby, and now with Shield.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Sevz on April 25, 2012, 02:29:29 PM
Shadows been suiciding as long as I remember the idiot. Killing him is way overdue and he knows it so don't go blaming me for you all cheating with this recent event. Failed attacks are code abuse but you've got some convenient exceptions. 

Put your hand up if you remember a time when you had lots of networth and it was destroyed in 1 day?
Think of the effort put towards creation and safety compared to the sloppy effort it takes to destroy it. Then consider that Shadow has access to the code so now failing leader attacks is strategically more plausible than it is immoral and unfair.
I've witnessed him do it at least 50 times over the years. That's a lot of cheating in my opinion. Never have I seen him win. Never have I seen him succeed without significant support along with playing dirty loopholes. He doesn't have the capacity to netgain so out of frustration strips everyone else of their abilities
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Wolf Snare on April 25, 2012, 04:54:15 PM
Quote from: Wolf Snare on April 24, 2012, 05:12:08 PM
- ask his third fourth turbo account.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Gen. Volkov on April 25, 2012, 11:21:05 PM
QuoteYeah, your mass messages were mildly funny.

I believe your words were, "hysterical".

Quote
But you also betrayed the team that made you emperor and gave them no recognition the entire time.

A) Sevz was planning to betray me. B)I left the clan after it was clear Sevah had no idea to return to where we had been. I betrayed no one, and I gave the team recognition constantly.

QuoteI can't even remember how many times throughout that span of a few months that you ran out of food or forget to raise defenses; you were counterproductive.

You are so full of crap. I never ran out of food. Not once. I had 10 bil food to start with, and 18 bil more food on the market. I raised defenses every single run, and the only issue I ever had was not being able to find someone to hold net while I ran to refresh them when they were about to run out. I was a great emp, and the only problem was Sevah's ideas of what I should do. Quit lying about me to make yourself feel better.

QuoteNow once again you're smack talking because your new clan is carrying you through. How long til you flipflop again?

*Rolls eyes* Again, you are full of crap. I had good reason to leave TEMPLE, and you know it.

Quote
I back it up when I gloat, I don't just start talking crap like that:

"Shield will be removing WAR from the top ten. blah blah blah"
"it's takedown time. blahblah"

OK, first off, Snare, name me more than one time I have not backed up my words. Literally the only time I "failed" was when I said I was going to kill Peace and didn't. You know the reason why that happened, we needed him for Fair Maiden. I was still intending to kill him, until he got an espy off on Holby and we had to accelerate our plans. Secondly, as Shadow said, since Shield has been around, when has it not backed up it's words?

QuoteJust cut out your insufferable whining and bragging, it's always one or the other.

Pot, I'd like you to meet kettle.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: abartell on April 26, 2012, 06:46:30 PM
Lol i'm so lost *walks drunkenly into a gunfight* as far as i can tell both of you guys are one exagerating or two flat out lying but i haven't figured out who's doing what *ducks flying bullets by hiding behind other bystanders*lol probably am about to get "shot".
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Gen. Volkov on April 27, 2012, 01:46:04 AM
No, I am telling the simple truth, Snare is exaggerating, blustering, and lying.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: abartell on April 27, 2012, 05:41:08 AM
Lol i never said you lied, i was talking about all of you, which almost leaves me to believe that you are at least exagerating every once in a while.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Sevz on April 27, 2012, 06:26:48 AM
Quote from: abartell on April 27, 2012, 05:41:08 AM
Lol i never said you lied, i was talking about all of you, which almost leaves me to believe that you are at least exagerating every once in a while.
He is. Voklov thinks he's perfect but when he was emperor he was bleeding the supporting team. Shield is dirty
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: abartell on April 27, 2012, 02:20:59 PM
Alright from what i understand Volkov was in a clan and they aided him a ton because they wanted to emp him but he left there clan emped and then after his reign he turned his back onthat clan because they then rejected him smeone please tell me if i'm wrong.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Shadow on April 27, 2012, 02:22:17 PM
you're pretty much entirely wrong ^_^
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: abartell on April 27, 2012, 02:27:07 PM
wow thanks :) but that is what i've gathered and i am pretty much confused, lol i feel like my teacher ms hambrick who trys to clarify something but turns them into something completely different.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Shadow on April 27, 2012, 02:34:55 PM
Basically Volkov got tired of Sevah not being able to adapt to the tactics being used against him and left TEMPLE, for which Snare and Sevs are bitter.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: abartell on April 27, 2012, 02:39:02 PM
oh ok thank u that sounds pretty plausable in my opinion
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Gen. Volkov on April 27, 2012, 11:34:06 PM
QuoteHe is. Voklov thinks he's perfect but when he was emperor he was bleeding the supporting team. Shield is dirty

How was I bleeding the support team? That's bull, I was completely self sufficient and sent out tons of aid.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Sevz on April 28, 2012, 12:42:38 AM
I don't care to argue with a brick wall. You'll figure it out eventually. Maybe i'll start playing dirty since you all speak rudely of me and the opinion has worn onto people who don't know me.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Wolf Snare on April 29, 2012, 03:20:55 PM
Quote from: Gen. Volkov on April 25, 2012, 11:21:05 PM
QuoteYeah, your mass messages were mildly funny.

I believe your words were, "hysterical".

Quote
But you also betrayed the team that made you emperor and gave them no recognition the entire time.

A) Sevz was planning to betray me. B)I left the clan after it was clear Sevah had no idea to return to where we had been. I betrayed no one, and I gave the team recognition constantly.

QuoteI can't even remember how many times throughout that span of a few months that you ran out of food or forget to raise defenses; you were counterproductive.

You are so full of crap. I never ran out of food. Not once. I had 10 bil food to start with, and 18 bil more food on the market. I raised defenses every single run, and the only issue I ever had was not being able to find someone to hold net while I ran to refresh them when they were about to run out. I was a great emp, and the only problem was Sevah's ideas of what I should do. Quit lying about me to make yourself feel better.

QuoteNow once again you're smack talking because your new clan is carrying you through. How long til you flipflop again?

*Rolls eyes* Again, you are full of crap. I had good reason to leave TEMPLE, and you know it.

Quote
I back it up when I gloat, I don't just start talking crap like that:

"Shield will be removing WAR from the top ten. blah blah blah"
"it's takedown time. blahblah"

OK, first off, Snare, name me more than one time I have not backed up my words. Literally the only time I "failed" was when I said I was going to kill Peace and didn't. You know the reason why that happened, we needed him for Fair Maiden. I was still intending to kill him, until he got an espy off on Holby and we had to accelerate our plans. Secondly, as Shadow said, since Shield has been around, when has it not backed up it's words?

QuoteJust cut out your insufferable whining and bragging, it's always one or the other.

Pot, I'd like you to meet kettle.

blaaah blah blah. Trying to convince me or yourself? I was referring to before we propped you up on your pedestal, actually. Perhaps if you didn't run with a full army every run dating back to before you joined rwl, you'd adapt much better to changes of pace in game. You wouldn't have to bail out when your support is waning.

Truth is, after the flag failed to carry you further, you were completely debilitated. You were scared of shadow striking again, so you did what you always do.

If I can't beat 'em, I join em! ~Volkov, 1984 - 2012

Not that any of this matters, I just feel like breaking your balls a little. Please "allow" us to live a little longer in reg.

Raise your defenses, noob. ;)
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Sharptooh on April 29, 2012, 06:09:02 PM
Quote from: Wolf Snare on April 25, 2012, 01:51:32 PM
Just cut out your insufferable whining and bragging, it's always one or the other.

The irony of this statement actually made me LOL (as a certain old man would put it)
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Genevieve on April 29, 2012, 06:11:56 PM
Quote from: Wolf Snare on April 29, 2012, 03:20:55 PM

If I can't beat 'em, I join em! ~Volkov, 1984 1964 - 2012


ftfy
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Sharptooh on April 29, 2012, 06:13:04 PM
Shouldn't there be a BC before 1964 and an AD after 2012?
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Wolf Snare on April 29, 2012, 07:24:30 PM
Sharpy, where'd you crawl out of?

Quote from: Sharptooh on April 29, 2012, 06:13:04 PM
Shouldn't there be a BC before 1964 and an AD after 2012?
it's BCE & CE, actually. But you're right. ;)
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Sharptooh on April 29, 2012, 07:49:06 PM
Quote from: Wolf Snare on April 29, 2012, 07:24:30 PM
Sharpy, where'd you crawl out of?

A dark dark place which contained many exams and lots of revision (well, I'm technically still there, but thought I'd visit)

Quote from: Wolf Snare on April 29, 2012, 07:24:30 PM
Quote from: Sharptooh on April 29, 2012, 06:13:04 PM
Shouldn't there be a BC before 1964 and an AD after 2012?
it's BCE & CE, actually. But you're right. ;)

LOL
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Durza on April 29, 2012, 07:56:20 PM
very nice sharpy. Very nice
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Wolf Snare on April 29, 2012, 08:44:27 PM
Welcome back from the abyss.
Love how you've adopted the LOL btw
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Gen. Volkov on April 29, 2012, 09:55:14 PM
Quoteblaaah blah blah. Trying to convince me or yourself? I was referring to before we propped you up on your pedestal, actually. Perhaps if you didn't run with a full army every run dating back to before you joined rwl, you'd adapt much better to changes of pace in game. You wouldn't have to bail out when your support is waning.

Again, you are completely full of crap. You have to know you are too. I don't even know why you bother to lie, when you know I'm just going to come on and point out how full of crap you are. Maybe you just enjoy trying to "torture" me? Well, news flash: It works better when you actually have the truth. You know I do not and have not run with a full army, that I am quite well "adapted" to the game, and that this is literally the first time I have "bailed" on a clan.

Quote
Truth is, after the flag failed to carry you further, you were completely debilitated. You were scared of shadow striking again, so you did what you always do.

If I can't beat 'em, I join em! ~Volkov, 1984 - 2012

I have literally never done that, and you know it. The truth is, I only joined the clan because Sevah promised me cash to do it, and then got me to stay by saying he could emp me. However, once I got up there, it was clear that Sevah had no CLUE what he was doing, and once the inevitable takedown happened, and Sevah still couldn't formulate an effective response, then I decided to leave. Only after that did I do anything with Shadow. I am not scared of Shadow, I was not scared of Shadow, I was fed up with Sevah's incompetence. He's a great player, but he was terrible in that situation.

QuoteNot that any of this matters, I just feel like breaking your balls a little. Please "allow" us to live a little longer in reg.

Again, it would work better if you were actually saying true things...

QuoteRaise your defenses, noob.

Maybe you should tell your net-holder to do that, since we caught him with his pants down, not the other way around.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Kilkenne on April 29, 2012, 11:26:57 PM
Why do you still do the thing where you quote everything, it still makes every argument you get into impossible to follow.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Gen. Volkov on April 30, 2012, 04:37:35 AM
Because that's what I do Kilk. It's what I have always done, and at this point, what with all your breaks from RWL, I have been posting on RWL longer than you. So perhaps you should just get used to it. I refuse to believe you find impossible to follow what I am saying in these conversations. Just saiyan.

Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Kilkenne on April 30, 2012, 08:16:37 AM
Why does your volume of daily argument deconstruction versus my not being here matter? Deconstructing paragraphs demeans you; Apparently you can't work on one train of thought. Please continue to do the thing where this is about my absense and not your absense of mental clarity for the purpose of ego preservation.

E: In before I HAVE BEEN POSTING FOR SO MANY MORE POSTS THAN YOU. Quality over quantity, ask Genevieve.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Sevz on April 30, 2012, 12:32:56 PM
Quote from: Kilkenne on April 30, 2012, 08:16:37 AM
Why does your volume of daily argument deconstruction versus my not being here matter? Deconstructing paragraphs demeans you; Apparently you can't work on one train of thought. Please continue to do the thing where this is about my absense and not your absense of mental clarity for the purpose of ego preservation.

E: In before I HAVE BEEN POSTING FOR SO MANY MORE POSTS THAN YOU. Quality over quantity, ask Genevieve.
Well said, Volkov completely blames me which is rather funny. I can't count how many runs I dedicated to protecting the fool. I'm accountable for my actions and when the netholder doesn't show initiative to preserve the teams efforts I've got no control.
I mean most the time Houndsy you barely covered your own costs and just expected me to hold troops and aid back regardless of my ratio or status. I mean that's sometimes alright but when you're not gaining any land or resources or doing any damage or advancing fast enough or even protecting the other landholders we can only do so much to keep you up top.
Plenty of times you didn't follow standard procedures and cost us hundreds of billions. Doubt you'd ever understand that you wanted to stay on top with the ego trip rather than cooperate and collect a lame but important kill.

All I can say is 50bil goes to whoever suicides and murders Hounds of Ulster.
Yes you all heard me right. I strongly dislike suiciding but Volks is special. Repeat the process until he drops the clan like a sissy.
Every time he runs turns I have a new 50b to donate. If you don' trust me i'll pay in advance.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Gen. Volkov on April 30, 2012, 02:37:26 PM
QuoteWhy does your volume of daily argument deconstruction versus my not being here matter? Deconstructing paragraphs demeans you; Apparently you can't work on one train of thought. Please continue to do the thing where this is about my absense and not your absense of mental clarity for the purpose of ego preservation.

E: In before I HAVE BEEN POSTING FOR SO MANY MORE POSTS THAN YOU. Quality over quantity, ask Genevieve.

Kilk, I can work on one train of thought. Just because I break posts up into specific points I am answering doesn't mean I am not also making an overarching point. The reason I am pointing out your absence is not for ego preservation, its because you want me to change to suit your whims. Since I have been here longer than you, I think my wishes take precedence over yours. If you cannot comprehend my posts, that's YOUR problem, not mine. So, you can just shut the hell up about how I post.

Oh, and you know very well that my posts are quality. I may not be the "#1 best poster" you think yourself to be, or the awesome poster Lucy actually is, but my posts are still quality.

Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Kilkenne on April 30, 2012, 02:47:09 PM
I'm pretty sure that the assumption that you are more important because you've been here longer is a completely arbitrary standard that you have set up to challenge the legitimacy of my claims. Frankly, I just want you to actually show everyone how intelligent you are as opposed to arbitrarily cut up words and use them in semi-context. Could be that you want to seem slow so that people don't take you seriously, which is a game I play, too. Cat's outta the bag now!

Let me respond, however, to the most important (unimportant) claim you have made, however by saying that I have the oldest account here by far (older than Shael's, ohno). (Let me interject that the previous sentence is sarcasm before you continue to get angry on the internet and indignant in your 7,156th post, which is 4,754 posts more important than my 2,402nd post) Therefore I believe very strongly that you should allow me to wear the laurel wreath. Also, Lucy is and has been #1 best poster.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Gen. Volkov on May 01, 2012, 03:11:36 AM
Quote from: KilkenneI'm pretty sure that the assumption that you are more important because you've been here longer is a completely arbitrary standard that you have set up to challenge the legitimacy of my claims. Frankly, I just want you to actually show everyone how intelligent you are as opposed to arbitrarily cut up words and use them in semi-context. Could be that you want to seem slow so that people don't take you seriously, which is a game I play, too. Cat's outta the bag now!

Actually, Kilk, the point is not that I am more important because I have been here longer. The point is that I have been around for this long with no complaints about my posting style. Literally none. Until you came in and decided that I was doing it wrong. I don't think you have the right, given the fact that no one has complained, aside from you.

Quotewhich is 4,754 posts more important than my 2,402nd post

To reiterate an earlier point, you've taken long breaks. When you are actually here, you post more than I do. That's not really relevant to the main point though, it's more of a jab at your quality trumps quantity comment. :)

Quote from: SevahWell said, Volkov completely blames me which is rather funny. I can't count how many runs I dedicated to protecting the fool. I'm accountable for my actions and when the netholder doesn't show initiative to preserve the teams efforts I've got no control.
I mean most the time Houndsy you barely covered your own costs and just expected me to hold troops and aid back regardless of my ratio or status. I mean that's sometimes alright but when you're not gaining any land or resources or doing any damage or advancing fast enough or even protecting the other landholders we can only do so much to keep you up top.
Plenty of times you didn't follow standard procedures and cost us hundreds of billions. Doubt you'd ever understand that you wanted to stay on top with the ego trip rather than cooperate and collect a lame but important kill.

What -edit- NO SWEARING. Seriously. All I did was to preserve the teams effort, and furthermore, I was always considerate of your situation when I asked if you could hold troops while I ran. Do you have any idea how many times I just had to sit and wait for you to be "ready" to aid back and forth. I think I lost more cash maintaining raised defenses than I did anything else, including the takedown, because YOU didn't want to take the troops. It was only the fact that I was highly productive that allowed me to survive your whims and tantrums. I covered my costs and managed to send out quite a bit of aid. As for ego trips, you are the only one who had one, when you got all jealous of me being on top.

QuoteAll I can say is 50bil goes to whoever suicides and murders Hounds of Ulster.
Yes you all heard me right. I strongly dislike suiciding but Volks is special. Repeat the process until he drops the clan like a sissy.
Every time he runs turns I have a new 50b to donate. If you don' trust me i'll pay in advance.

Whoever does this has to be clanned to do it. That's why Sevah isn't doing it himself. So be warned, any attack on me in this manner will result in the destruction of far more than 50 billion cash worth of stuff. The simple fact is, you want me to have net. Me with net is a much more constrained and less dangerous opponent than me without net.


You've been warned.
Holby,
modding
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Sevz on May 01, 2012, 11:44:58 PM
Why would I be jealous of you holding networth? I'm using a Fox. I was only annoyed when you didn't follow orders which cos you always know best you never did.
Instead of us killing the dirty suicider you went against the clans best interests saying trash like killing is lame.

Not true. Killing is the purpose of the game. You make allies and enemies. What's the point of having an enemy if you don't kill them? What's the punishment for being a mongrel?
If someone's being a dirtbag and not making networth for themselves you clearly can't retaliate by destroying their networth.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Gen. Volkov on May 02, 2012, 01:30:57 AM
QuoteWhy would I be jealous of you holding networth? I'm using a Fox. I was only annoyed when you didn't follow orders which cos you always know best you never did.

You are a Fox now, but at the time, I believe you were a stoat. I followed your orders plenty of times, even though they went against my own best judgement. And look how it ended up.

QuoteInstead of us killing the dirty suicider you went against the clans best interests saying trash like killing is lame.

Killing is lame, and it wouldn't have affected anything, he would have been back within a run. You didn't know how to deal with him, so you decide to try and kill him. It was a stupid move and I'm not going to apologize for not going along with it.

QuoteNot true. Killing is the purpose of the game. You make allies and enemies. What's the point of having an enemy if you don't kill them? What's the punishment for being a mongrel?

Killing is an option. When has killing anyone ever worked out well for you? The purpose of the game is to WIN, and the punishment for being a "mongrel" is LOSING.

QuoteIf someone's being a dirtbag and not making networth for themselves you clearly can't retaliate by destroying their networth.

You can do other things to them though, and you never even considered them. You jumped straight to "lets kill him".
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Pippin on May 02, 2012, 02:31:08 AM
volkov, why does the clan your in destroy billions of networth, and then you openly say on the forums that you will destroy far more than 50b cash networth to anyone who tries to retal/murder you? wimp

i dont want you with net either, your less of a threat under 200m net than with 1.3b
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Sevz on May 02, 2012, 07:26:26 AM
I'll pay more than 50b to see Volko cry
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Wolf Snare on May 02, 2012, 10:57:20 AM
Quote from: Gen. Volkov on April 29, 2012, 09:55:14 PM
You know I do not and have not run with a full army

You always have, noob.

Quote from: Gen. Volkov on April 29, 2012, 09:55:14 PM
that I am quite well "adapted" to the game,

Oh please, you've emped three times in your life. The only two that matter were here at RWL, and both times I put you there. Go back to ZAP if you wanna act like a big tough guy, least on their playerbase of 4 people you could semi back it up.
As for 3.0; no, not really. getting to third spot on the second day does not constitute expertise. Your "skills" are mediocre at best, and I reckon I'm just feeling generous today.

Quote from: Gen. Volkov on April 29, 2012, 09:55:14 PM
and that this is literally the first time I have "bailed" on a clan.

blahblahblah. Ever heard of a liability? yeah, you. All other times your team conceded their unmet expectations, cut their losses, and let you go off on your own to better themselves.

Quote from: Gen. Volkov on April 29, 2012, 09:55:14 PM
I have literally never done that, and you know it. The truth is, I only joined the clan because Sevah promised me cash to do it, and then got me to stay by saying he could emp me. I wanted to use you guys to compensate for my lack of skills, emp comfortably under your watchful eye and leave you without a moments notice whilst failing to recognize your hospitality. Oh, then I respond with my own animosity months later when the topic surfaces.

Corrected your structural error.

Quote from: Gen. Volkov on April 29, 2012, 09:55:14 PM
I am not scared of Shadow, I was not always have been scared of Shadow,
fix'd

Quote from: Gen. Volkov on April 29, 2012, 09:55:14 PM
I was fed up with Sevah's incompetence. He's a great player, but he was terrible in that situation.

I'd really hate to think of what that made you then. sevah is brilliant, speaking illy of his playing ability makes you look stupid. I dare you to play any competent promi player 1 vs 1, we'll show you the true meaning of incompetence.

Quote from: Gen. Volkov on April 29, 2012, 09:55:14 PM
Again, it would work better if you were actually saying true things...

I suppose the truth hits you like a brick wall when you're in denial for so long. Everyone wouldn't be chirping you if there was no legitimacy to my words.

Quote from: Gen. Volkov on April 29, 2012, 09:55:14 PM
QuoteRaise your defenses, noob.
Maybe you should tell your net-holder to do that, since we caught him with his pants down, not the other way around.

Is that why you had 6m leaders on 40k land, no shields? Not more than a week ago? I'm a rat, and I know that. Would you like a mentor, Volky? Maybe we can direct you toward someone that can show you the ropes, no?

Quote from: Gen. Volkov on April 29, 2012, 09:55:14 PM
As for ego trips, you are the only one who had one, when you got all jealous of me being on top.

We put you up top, you imbecile. Sevah has been emperor more times than -edit- not an appropriate analogy and you should be worshipping him when promi is concerned, not belittling him. Honestly, he does deserve a good scolding, for ever considering you worthy.

Quote from: Gen. Volkov on April 29, 2012, 09:55:14 PM
Me with net is a much more constrained and less dangerous opponent than me without net.

Dangerous opponent? let's duel, Volkov, I'll make your beady eyes swell up with tears. I'll crumble the one area of your life that you can get away with blatantly exercising this (unfounded) machismo -edit-.

No more personal attacks.

Not going to warn you again.

Holby, modding.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Holby on May 02, 2012, 05:25:27 PM
Both of you, cut out the personal attacks.

Holby, modding
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Shadow on May 02, 2012, 07:18:31 PM
This thread is awful and you should both feel bad for causing it.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Gen. Volkov on May 02, 2012, 11:35:11 PM
I didn't personally attack anyone, though I did swear. I figured it would be caught by the auto-censor. It's not my fault you guys don't have that word on it.

Quote from: pippinvolkov, why does the clan your in destroy billions of networth, and then you openly say on the forums that you will destroy far more than 50b cash networth to anyone who tries to retal/murder you? wimp

Sorry, but what? We destroyed billions in NW in retaliation to attacks on us. We haven't started any of the exchanges that have involved Shield destroying NW. We just finish them. I was putting that out there as a warning, don't come after me or my clan unprovoked. If we destroy someone's net unprovoked, I have no problem getting into a fight. I'm just warning against people who think it's a good idea to try and suckerpunch Shield.

Quotei dont want you with net either, your less of a threat under 200m net than with 1.3b

So you think, but actually I've destroyed more net when I've been under 200m net than when I've been in first place.

Quote from: Wolf SnareYou always have, noob.

Have you always been this full of baloney, or am I just noticing now because you've decided to throw a tantrum?

QuoteOh please, you've emped three times in your life. The only two that matter were here at RWL, and both times I put you there. Go back to ZAP if you wanna act like a big tough guy, least on their playerbase of 4 people you could semi back it up.

I think I played at ZAP, once, like 7 years ago. As for the rest, yeah, because me emping is totally the only thing that counts. *Rollseyes*

QuoteAs for 3.0; no, not really. getting to third spot on the second day does not constitute expertise. Your "skills" are mediocre at best, and I reckon I'm just feeling generous today.

*Blink* Third spot? Fairly sure I was in first, the last time I logged out. In fact, every round I've played in 3.0, I've ended up in the top 5 at minimum. Besides, when you stop teaming with Sevah literally every round, riding his coat-tails, and actually try to do something solo, like I have, then you might have a leg to stand on to criticize how I'm playing the game.

Quote
blahblahblah. Ever heard of a liability? yeah, you. All other times your team conceded their unmet expectations, cut their losses, and let you go off on your own to better themselves.

LOL. You are just making stuff up now.

Quote
Corrected your structural error. Fed my ego by making up ridiculous crap.

Fixed it for you.

Quote from: Gen. VolkovI am not scared of Shadow, I have never been scared of Shadow.

Quote from: Wolf Snarefix'd

Fixed it for you again.

QuoteI'd really hate to think of what that made you then. sevah is brilliant, speaking illy of his playing ability makes you look stupid. I dare you to play any competent promi player 1 vs 1, we'll show you the true meaning of incompetence.

I have played competent promi players 1v1. I played SEVAH 1v1, and it came to a draw. Sevah is a good player, as an individual, but he's not good at dealing with the situation TEMPLE was in. If he had been able to get over his own arrogance, and ask for advice, I'm pretty sure we could have turned things around. But he was too convinced of his own brilliance and skill to ever take advice. You, Snare, would have been a better choice to lead TEMPLE in that situation. But you were too busy riding Sevah's coat-tails, convinced he is "brilliant", and getting drunk to realize it.

QuoteI suppose the truth hits you like a brick wall when you're in denial for so long. Everyone wouldn't be chirping you if there was no legitimacy to my words.

Snare, define "everyone". Because I'm pretty sure "everyone" is not you and Sevah. There is no legitimacy to you words because you are talking about things that NEVER HAPPENED.

Quote
Is that why you had 6m leaders on 40k land, no shields? Not more than a week ago? I'm a rat, and I know that. Would you like a mentor, Volky? Maybe we can direct you toward someone that can show you the ropes, no?

Are we talking about the day after Shadow and I took out WAR's netholder? When Sevah tried to murder me and got one off, before failing 3 times? I think my shields ran out for a small amount of time in there, as I was somewhat busy destroying all your clan's stored net, and forgot. Then Sevah got one murder off, failed several more times, and I got on and reset my shields. Yeah, my leader ratio must have been SO bad if Sevah could get one murder off before his ratio fell too low to get through again.

Quote
We put you up top.

LOL. That's what made it so ridiculous. You guys did put me up top, and then Sevah got all jealous of me being on top and started plotting to take it for himself. You, yourself, literally warned me of this.

QuoteSevah has been emperor more times than -edit- not an appropriate analogy and you should be worshipping him when promi is concerned, not belittling him. Honestly, he does deserve a good scolding, for ever considering you worthy.

Sevah has taken first place in Turbo about as many times as you and Shadow have. I consider him a worthy opponent, as an individual player, but I'm hardly going to start "worshipping" him. This line of argument just doesn't work Snare, and you know it. I'm sorry that you are all pissy, but you being E-mad at me doesn't suddenly make me a worse player. Sevah screwed up running TEMPLE. You know, I know it, and the whole game knows it. You should just admit it and move on, rather than filling this thread with pointless, untrue attacks on me because you don't want to admit it.

QuoteDangerous opponent? let's duel, Volkov, I'll make your beady eyes swell up with tears. I'll crumble the one area of your life that you can get away with blatantly exercising this (unfounded) machismo.

Fine Snare, let's duel, if that will make you happy. You do not scare me Snare. I just hope you are a better player than you are a debater, because you truly suck at this. As for the rest... since you are pretty clearly being the internet tough guy in this conversation, that's pretty silly of you to say. I didn't realize rational, logical responses to your ridiculous macho posturing was "machismo".
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Sevz on May 03, 2012, 12:58:49 AM
Just to show how Volkov lies to make me look bad

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 04:21:55 -0700    Ruler of Conjuration (#21)
Clan:    The Hounds of Ulster (#7)
Clan: Shield   Mission: Murder
Failed
Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:47:31 -0700    Ruler of Conjuration (#21)
Clan:    The Hounds of Ulster (#7)
Clan: Shield   Mission: Murder
Success
Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:45:14 -0700    Ruler of Conjuration (#21)
Clan:    The Hounds of Ulster (#7)
Clan: Shield   Mission: Steal
Failed

Read reverse. I was on a poor ratio and failed the steal. Sent a murder off and there was no shield next one failed. Volkov says I'm soo stupid I think magically my ratio would improve. Keep embellishing stories. Our duel wasn't a draw I just had sympathy and bigger plans. I won because you couldn't get an offensive mission on me while I got heaps on you. The only thing you had against me was persistence.

As for temple falling. Try think about the bigger picture. Your plans to survive the code abuse was with more code abuse. Everyone knows deliberately failing constant attacks is not the way the game was designed. Heck I remember getting temporarily disabled for having defence before. All I did was play normal and people couldn't break after I logged off so the story was I got someone to intentionally max me. I'm a sportsman but I bet if I made a habit of suiciding down netholders the admins would modify the code a little.

I challenge you to a duel. Every mistake you make I'll be putting it on the forums for all to see.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Gen. Volkov on May 03, 2012, 01:43:19 AM
QuoteRead reverse. I was on a poor ratio and failed the steal. Sent a murder off and there was no shield next one failed. Volkov says I'm soo stupid I think magically my ratio would improve. Keep embellishing stories.

I have no idea what goes through your brain, I just know there was one success and then you failed afterwards. As for the multiple failures, I could have sworn my news said you failed at least twice, though the second failure was separated a bit in time. However, this is what is in my newsfeed, so it appears I was wrong about the multiple failures.

5 days, 19.1 hours ago    Ruler of Conjuration (#21) tried to eliminate your forces!
6 days, 0.6 hours ago    3% of your forces were eliminated by Ruler of Conjuration (#21)!
6 days, 0.7 hours ago    You find Ruler of Conjuration (#21) trying to steal your money!

Apologies. I don't generally lie about people. I don't need to do so, because I have self-confidence. I do make mistakes though, and when I do, I apologize.

Quote
Our duel wasn't a draw I just had sympathy and bigger plans. I won because you couldn't get an offensive mission on me while I got heaps on you. The only thing you had against me was persistence.

I got plenty of offensive missions on you. Don't lie to make me look bad. As for persistence... that isn't exactly a bad trait to have, and why Snare's claims that I "jump ship" constantly or whatever are so ridiculous. I'm one of the most stubborn people on RWL. I'm being nice saying it was a draw, to be honest. You gave up, I was willing to keep going. The object of battle is to make the enemy not want to fight anymore, so by that standard, I won. I don't care what your supposed reasons were, you weren't willing to continue the fight.

QuoteAs for temple falling. Try think about the bigger picture. Your plans to survive the code abuse was with more code abuse. Everyone knows deliberately failing constant attacks is not the way the game was designed. Heck I remember getting temporarily disabled for having defence before. All I did was play normal and people couldn't break after I logged off so the story was I got someone to intentionally max me. I'm a sportsman but I bet if I made a habit of suiciding down netholders the admins would modify the code a little.

It's not code abuse, no matter how many times you say it, and my plan to survive it was not more code abuse, though I admit the tactic was a bit dirty. No more dirty than suicides though.

QuoteI challenge you to a duel. Every mistake you make I'll be putting it on the forums for all to see.

So wait, who am I dueling first? Is this reg, or turbo? Do I have to fight you both at the same time? Are we going to stay clanned for it? It is going to be unclanned? Are you both just going to suckerpunch me, like you did Shadow, or are there going to be rules? I'm perfectly willing to fight you guys, both at once or one at time, but I need to know the circumstances. Also, if you guys are going to team up on me, I think it's only fair if I get a partner as well.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Sevz on May 03, 2012, 09:00:08 AM
Your a marked man. 50bil goes to whoever takes you down. Any means. Suiciding is fine by you. You'll deal with it great
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Shadow on May 03, 2012, 11:37:46 AM
Quote from: Gen. Volkov on May 02, 2012, 11:35:11 PM
I didn't personally attack anyone, though I did swear. I figured it would be caught by the auto-censor. It's not my fault you guys don't have that word on it.
The censor is not there to allow you to swear, it is there to attempt to block it when someone breaks the rule and does. The familiar adage is "don't test the filter".
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Gen. Volkov on May 03, 2012, 11:41:56 PM
Quote from: ShadowThe censor is not there to allow you to swear, it is there to attempt to block it when someone breaks the rule and does. The familiar adage is "don't test the filter".

I wasn't testing the filter, I didn't even know the word wasn't blocked. Honestly, sometimes you just have a need to say something stronger than "a stoat's behind". If I actually wanted to swear, I know how to get around the filter.

Quote from: SevzYour a marked man. 50bil goes to whoever takes you down. Any means. Suiciding is fine by you. You'll deal with it great

What happened to the duel? I thought you were going to show me how great you are. Not that it would actually prove anything, since my points are all about a team environment rather than individual skills, still though, what happened to this duel idea?
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Sevz on May 04, 2012, 06:35:16 AM
Lose the clan and your stoatsbehind is mine.

I'll get the public to exile you out of teamplay and forced into the duel.
Fox vs Wolf. I'll uncloak when I declare my own victory. Total conquest not submission.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: abartell on May 04, 2012, 02:50:57 PM
lol i would feel bad if i encouraged a fight but i really want one so guys don't fight *whispers behind hand please fight*
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Gen. Volkov on May 05, 2012, 12:08:13 AM
QuoteLose the clan and your stoatsbehind is mine.

I'll get the public to exile you out of teamplay and forced into the duel.
Fox vs Wolf. I'll uncloak when I declare my own victory. Total conquest not submission.

I hope you know how ridiculous you are.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Shadow on May 05, 2012, 07:46:10 AM
I hope you know that the fact that you aren't simply ignoring him is the reason for him being so ridiculous.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Sevz on May 05, 2012, 11:57:23 AM
Pretty much aye. Don't trash me and I'll show respect.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Gen. Volkov on May 06, 2012, 12:35:43 AM
He'd be ridiculous whether I ignored him or not. Silly Shadow.
Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Holby on May 06, 2012, 03:12:04 AM
Quote from: Gen. Volkov on May 06, 2012, 12:35:43 AM
He'd be ridiculous whether I ignored him or not. Silly Shadow.
This thread makes you look bad. Please stop posting  :-\

Title: Re: Takedown
Post by: Gen. Volkov on May 06, 2012, 06:44:53 AM
You really think I care? I've really had quite enough of people's unasked for judgments of me. If you want the thread to die, then don't post in it anymore, because I was done talking until you decided to butt in.