(http://i27.tinypic.com/2wntlhf.jpg)
Why does it still say 'Too Big'? I can attack people with higher networth than this with no problems. Is there something I'm missing here? :P
They're a fox. Foxes can cloak their net to appear less then it actaully is ;)
Quote from: Firetooth on June 03, 2008, 10:00:05 AM
They're a fox. Foxes can cloak their net to appear less then it actaully is ;)
For reals? Is that new?
It's been around since I joined, but then again I haven't been playing long lol.
Yep, it's Fox's new ability, every time they Cloak, their public networth shows as 1% lower. Uncloak brings it back 1% higher, but no higher than their real networth.
Lekahrym (#633)
Turns (?) 450 (max 450)
Turns Stored (?) 150 (max 150)
Rank (?) #10
Workers (?) 153,328
Acres (?) 16,247
Cash (?) $10,017,748,491
Food (?) 514,226,114
Loyalty (?) 33,797,687
Networth (?) $2,096,766,505
Location (?) Southsward
Race (?) Fox
Health (?) 100%
Tax Rate (?) 11%
Rats (?) 1,293,983,643
Weasels (?) 4,443
Stoats (?) 181,035,824
Skiffs (?) 8,383,273
Leaders (?) 2,708,396
darn. Who is behind this??
Hm... does that make him emp?
Actually uncloak removes 100% of the cloak in one cast, or it's supposed to...
Hmm, Shadow I think he's only Emp if he uncloaks. He's been like this for a long time, he obviously has some accomplices sending him aid aswell.
As in... Hidden Fox?
...I get it now. XD
Still can't attack him, even if I set his clan to war...
Ya, the "Hidden Fox" name for the new theme was inspired by the new fox race.
Quote from: Wolf Snare on June 03, 2008, 12:13:20 PM
Lekahrym (#633)
Turns (?) 450 (max 450)
Turns Stored (?) 150 (max 150)
Rank (?) #10
Workers (?) 153,328
Acres (?) 16,247
Cash (?) $10,017,748,491
Food (?) 514,226,114
Loyalty (?) 33,797,687
Networth (?) $2,096,766,505
Location (?) Southsward
Race (?) Fox
Health (?) 100%
Tax Rate (?) 11%
Rats (?) 1,293,983,643
Weasels (?) 4,443
Stoats (?) 181,035,824
Skiffs (?) 8,383,273
Leaders (?) 2,708,396
[darn]. Who is behind this??
Wow. Pretty impressive with a bit more work he might match me, oblit, and codys 4.5bil net.
Imagine how much one murder would take :D
I know. 4 did 150mil net damaged. 150 divide 4=37.5mil net each time
This hasn't been said aloud yet, but I'm pretty sure that some of you are thinking it...
He is going to try and lock land. There is no other reason for him to have so many rats, and then be moving on to stoats.
I did 4murders. Ill message you ingame taek.
Guess it doesn't matter now because some random idiot decided to murder away all his net unprovoked. Good going Sharptooh, you new players sure are welcoming to others...
I have personal reason's for murdering kell, look in the other topic, it explains
wat is your reasoning for destroying Lekahrym???? You are starting to piss me off.
Well I agreed to two different players to not murder lek anymore.
However, I have to say lek had no shields when I did those 4murders. Im not defending sharptooth, but lek woulda lost far less had he raised defences. Heck, if this was valhall forums people would probarbly be congratulating sharptooth :D
Edit: Content removed :P
This isn't valhall, and Lek couldn't have run to raise shields with all those troops if he wanted to. It was pointless, and it is going to cost Sharptooh dearly once he has something worth ruining.
Hmm. Id say easiest to do would just be to murder down taek, that would ruin all his efforts. Not like Id encourage that ;)
Murders only lead to more murders. I'm thinking something a little more interesting.
What, like destroying all his loyalty? :D Im only even on reg anymore to help out wisey and krowdon. Same with feng I think.
You'll see. Us oldbies can only be tested so much before the genocide begins..
This sounds fun :D Maybe Ill stick around to watch it?
I have to say, Sharptooth, It baffles me entirely that you would do something like that. In a situation where it is literally IMPOSSIBLE that a player could have provoked you, you decided to destroy everything they had.
I really confounds me... I don't think anyone would be on your side right now.
Quote from: Peace Alliance on June 06, 2008, 10:42:30 PM
I have to say, Sharptooth, It baffles me entirely that you would do something like that. In a situation where it is literally IMPOSSIBLE that a player could have provoked you, you decided to destroy everything they had.
I really confounds me... I don't think anyone would be on your side right now.
Are you talking about lek or kell?
Pretty sure he means lek. He destroyed over 1bil of lek's net...
I am guilty of murdering him as well, although i did not destroy that much net. From now on you guys have to tell me these things. When i get pissed off i make bad decisions ^_^
Quote from: Wolf Snare on June 06, 2008, 02:48:11 PM
[What The Ferret] is your reasoning for destroying Lekahrym???? You are starting to piss me off.
I'm about to drown amid all the tears being shed here.
Amazing how you can type so much and yet contribute absolutely nothing
Quote from: Shadow on June 11, 2008, 04:03:28 PM
Amazing how you can type so much and yet contribute absolutely nothing
I apologize for my overly lengthy posts. I know they might be hard for some of you to read through, what with everyone's short attention spans these days.
No, you fail to understand. Your posts are long, but full of chaff that adds nothing. You don't contribute to discussions at all beyond correcting people's grammar and occasionally insulting someone you don't know. Stop making a fool of yourself.
Well Shadow, GramnEar a,nd Pu.nacation .a!nd Spiling ! I,s I^mporda%t! :D