Topics

Highly inaccurate, at a minimum. Double damage, I think.

Losses:

45,768 acres ($22,884,000 networth)
46,534,698 stoats ($186,138,792 networth)
635,381,977 grain ($12,707,640 networth)
$3,211,205,079 cash ($1,284,482 networth)

Total losses: $223,014,914 networth

Quick estimation reveals that I ACTUALLY lost approximately twice that amount. Prior to the losses being inflicted, by networth was approximately $980,000,000. At this point, it's dropped to approximately $571,153,748. That's a greater than $400,000,000 loss reflected as well in troops and cash lost (but not counted, and I would assume grain as well would factor in). That's double the amount lost sans the value of land loss.

So either an exploit was in use by Bewj (Juskabelly, if I'm not mistaken) or there's a rather serious readout bug that needs to be fixed.

So yeah can an admin help me with a password reset? I tried logging in a week ago I think, but I was... inebriated.

A few ideas I've come up with.

1) Round attacks to 20 on an unclanned warlord
2) Adjust attack ops based on networth change; if someone is maxed and doubles their NW, half their attack ops open. If someone increases their networth ten-fold, 90% of their attack ops open.
3) Adjust sack and capture potential based on OP/DP basis.

Sack = ( OP / DP ) / 50

So, Sack = ( 1000 / 500 ) / 50 = 0.04, or 4% of food is sacked and 4% of cash is sacked. To determine this number, food is valued at $10 each and cash at face-value. So if someone has 10,000 food and $100,000 cash ($100k in cash, $100k in food), that's the total value for the sack. As they're equal, it'd be half in food and half in cash. $8000 worth would be sacked; $4000 cash, 400 food.

Put a limit on OP/DP at something like 4 or 5. A 4 limit would put the limit of sacking at 8% and a 5 limit would put the limit of sacking at 10%. These are fairly large numbers. The other thought is to give Standard Attack the full power Sack and Capture, limiting Guerilla/Bombard/Aerial/Naval to perhaps half-power or less. This will keep sacking reliable and profitable.

Similarly...

Capture = ( OP / DP ) / 100

So, Capture = ( 1000 / 500 ) / 100 = 0.02, or 2% of leaders are captured in an attack.
Put the limit on Capture at something like 4 or 5 again, so that Capture = ( 1000 / 0 (rounded to 1) ) / 100 = 0.05, or 5% of leaders are captured in an attack. This will make defending as a leader much more lucrative. In order to balance this, give Standard perhaps a 50% boost in leaders captured; make it worth your while to use the tougher attack types.

4) Make clans more lucrative; make it an actual player that can be attacked and defended. Bestow something like 1 turn an hour per member in the clan. Stats are made up of all players in that clan.

George: 100,000 rats, 1,000 weasels, 10,000 stoats, 5,000 skiffs, 5,000 leaders, 1,500 land.
Tom: 5,000 rats, 10,000 weasels, 1,000 stoats, 5,000 skiffs, 100,000 leaders, 1,000 land.
Harry: 1,000 rats, 10,000 weasels, 5,000 stoats, 100,000 skiffs, 5,000 leaders, 500 land.

Boys Total: 106,000 rats, 21,000 weasels, 16,000 stoats, 110,000 skiffs, 110,000 leaders, 3,000 land.
Boys OP: 994,000
Boys DP: 1,160,000
Boys Leader Ratio: 36.6667 on 3,000 land


Sue: 0 rats, 0 weasels, 0 stoats, 1,000 skiffs, 100,000 leaders, 1,000 land.
Betty: 1,000 rats, 1,000 weasels, 1,000 stoats, 1,000 skiffs, 100,000 leaders, 1,000 land.
Martha: 100,000 rats, 5,000 weasels, 5,000 stoats, 1,000 skiffs, 1,000 leaders, 500 land.

Girls Total: 101,000 rats, 6,000 weasels, 6,000 stoats, 3,000 skiffs, 201,000 leaders, 2,500 land.
Girls OP: 340,600
Girls DP: 179,000
Girls Leader Ratio: 80.4 on 2,500 land

Now there are two land attacks and a few leader missions. The Boys would be able to do Standard Attacks on the Girls. If they wanted to use Capture, for example...

Capture = ( OP / DP ) / 100
Capture = ( 994,000 / 179,000 ) / 100
Capture = 5.5531 / 100
Capture = 0.05553
Capture = 11,162 leaders distributed evenly to the Boys (3720.5 to each)

Now what if they wanted to use Clan Leader missions?

Boy's Attack Ratio = 40
Girl's Defense Ratio = 84.42
AR / DR = 0.4738

The Boys would be unable to do anything against the Girls, at least as a clan. Now let's look at the inverse...

Girl's Attack Ratio = 73.0909
Boy's Defense Ratio = 38.5
AR / DR = 1.8985

The girls would be able to do anything BUT use Leader Attack.

Here's how leadering as a clan would be different.

Espionage = Shows the sum of offensive points, defensive points, as well as the total networth, total leader count, and total land count. Less information, but more of what "matters" to a clan attacking.
Murder = 3% on all warlords (cut down to 1% when using shields)
Poison = 9.12% food and 12.76% cash destroyed (cut down to 3.04% food and 4.25% cash when using shields) on all warlords.
Steal = 10-15% cash stole (3.33% to 5% when using shields) from the warlord with the most cash.
Open Attack Opportunity = 1 attack opportunity opened on every member of that clan.

Thoughts? Alternative suggestions?

I was just taking a look at clan ranking on Turbo.

Interrogations for Fun and Profit!     Question     6     $192,031,922     $1,152,191,529
Answer    Answer    5    $103,634,913    $414,539,652
Forces of Evil    F.O.E.    6    $30,231,667    $211,621,671

Two few issues with read-out...
1) There are 7 members of FOE
2) There are 4 members of Answer

I'm unsure what's happening with FOE, but with Answer it appears that #45's death and thus removal from the clan is still being counted as a member (and founder).

I just ran into a weird glitch. I was doing a few quick little studies into doing kills (I killed 1 warlord and then started on a second) and I ran into an issue. At 5 land, my target seemed to erect an impenetrable wall of defenses. I attacked with 22 million rats and I couldn't break at 100% health. I proceeded to do an espionage on the target's clan and I found something interesting: there were ~500k rats or so total, meaning that the maximum sized 200k rats shared were doing some real overtime: 20x overtime. ??? Further, I wasn't losing the proper rate of troops. No matter what I did, that warlord stood at 5 land and I only lost a few hundred troops.

ADD'L INFO: I proceeded to kill another warlord in the clan and it all went normally. The first was the clan's leader, the second was the clan's assistant, the third was a normal member in the clan.

FINALE: Turned out what I found was basically a land disagreement--so long as rounds are setup, this should not happen (unless onlined where there's a slim chance of something like this happening).

I don't know if it's entirely broken, but troop sharing isn't working properly anymore. In short, custom sharing percentages have no effect. In my clan, 40% sharing is only showing as 10% sharing, so either readout is broken or it's only 10% of my forces being shared.

The Great Emperor of Samperta County, Ublaz, has been stuck down today by the sword of his Divisional Commander, Bob-sama, of the Army of Ublaz. In this viscous coup d'état, the mighty Commander Bob-sama had marched upon the flanks of his opposition. Divisional Commander Peace Alliance, of the Trident Guard, was entirely fortified around the remaining acres held by the former Emperor Ublaz himself. By marching upon the flanks of Peace Alliance, he commanded his army of Stoats to attack and cause chaos to the ranks of Peace Alliance, who threatened the balance of power in Samperta. Despite a noble effort and valiant fight, Peace Alliance's army of Stoats lay beaten in he wayside. As their Commander and his lieutenants begin to count the casualties, Bob-sama initiated the Emperor Ublaz's final orders: Operation Valkyrie, and peacefully and quickly overran the border. Bob-sama himself delivered the fatal blow, and has rightful claim to his Throne.

Emperor Ublaz is dead.


Yours,

Bob-sama
The First Player Emperor of Samperta

Some nobody did a networth hack. #26 on turbo. I just saw it on the Top10 list.

Ok now, of course the strategy overall used to flood Regular with about 250,000 acres in about 3 minutes was illegal and used an exploit. The specifics of that exploit shouldn't be shared: it's still possible to do, just at a lower speed. Anyways: some people may have realized that you can scout for >250 land per turn as a Lizard at basically no land. Why should, in Regular or Turbo, scouting be illegal? My opinion is yes--it floods the game with land. It's uncontrollable: it's the strategy for EVERYONE ELSE. Neither Shade nor I could control who the land went to when we did it before, and again yes we flooded Reg with roughly 250k acres. So, I agree that the exploit itself should be 100% illegal. I disagree that scouting at 1 land should be illegal. It's your account, it's your time. If a player wants to scout for >100k land in a run, great. Let them--but don't let them use the exploit to speed it up a LOT. Scouting's in the game, again, because it's meant to make new land. My opinion is scouting at 1 land is as much an exploit as a suicide with 1 hut. The difference is scouting is an enabler, and brings new land into the game that may have been removed because people deleted, were disabled, or went on a long-term vacation. It's just another strategy.

By the way--the person scouting for all that land probably won't reap the benefits of that land: they get a tired hand and the hope that it helps an ally or two out.

$10b cash disappeared


0 hours ago     Dark Side of the Moon (#23) has sent you 45,448 Skiffs carrying...     $10,458,901,133
Mark News as Read
View News Archive (7 days)

Mailbox    Turns: 162    Cash: $1,913,822,828    Land: 51,662    Loyalty: 6,073,040    Food: 4,266,197,004    Health: 29%    Networth: $267,306,847




At your present rate, you will run out of cash in 24 Turns, so you should not do more than 12 missions.

Mailbox    Turns: 162    Cash: $1,913,822,828    Land: 51,662    Loyalty: 6,073,040    Food: 4,266,197,004    Health: 29%    Networth: $267,306,847

0.1 hours ago     You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.     In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
7,297 Workers
0.1 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
8,750 Leaders
0 Workers
0.1 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
0 Workers
0.1 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
0 Workers
0 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
7,273 Workers
0 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
7,249 Workers
0 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
7,224 Workers
0 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
0 Workers
0 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
7,200 Workers
0 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
0 Workers
0 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
8,720 Leaders
7,176 Workers
0 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
8,691 Leaders
7,152 Workers
0 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
8,662 Leaders
0 Workers
0 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
8,633 Leaders
7,129 Workers
0 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
8,605 Leaders
7,105 Workers
0 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
8,576 Leaders
0 Workers
0 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
0 Workers
0 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
7,081 Workers
0 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
8,547 Leaders
7,057 Workers
0 hours ago    You find Shadow (#6) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
0 Workers

He ended up taking all the cities. And more, this is my page now...

Bob-sama (#472)
Networth    $127,284,378
Land    15,730 Acres
Citys    Skalgerag
Denduron
light place
Gondolin
Helm\\\'s Deep
Helm\\\'s Deep
Race    Stoat
Location    Southsward
Clan    None
Rank    11
Attack?    Yourself
Defenses    1227 (3%)
Attacks    1941 (74%)
Kills    0
Land Gained in Attacks    2,196,193
Land Lost in Attacks    1,670,605
Created On    February 20, 2008

See a problem? I know I do.

Furthermore, they don't appear on the WL info page.

15 recent news events:
Date/Time    Attacker    Defender    Outcome
Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:11:24 -0600    Dark Side of the Moon (#23)
Clan:    Bob-sama (#472)
Clan:    Guerilla Strike
314 Acres
Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:00:26 -0600    Bob-sama (#472)
Clan:    Obscurum in Oriens (#288)
Clan:    Mission: Attack
Failed

On Shadow's page...

Attacker     Defender     Outcome
Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:06:30 -0600    Shadow (#6)
Clan: =|^|=    Hells Militia (#881)
Clan: Armada    Guerilla Strike
2137 Acres
Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:06:29 -0600    Shadow (#6)
Clan: =|^|=    Hells Militia (#881)
Clan: Armada    Guerilla Strike
1799 Acres
Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:06:28 -0600    Shadow (#6)
Clan: =|^|=    Hells Militia (#881)
Clan: Armada    Guerilla Strike
1215 Acres
Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:06:27 -0600    Shadow (#6)
Clan: =|^|=    Hells Militia (#881)
Clan: Armada    Guerilla Strike
1290 Acres
Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:06:26 -0600    Shadow (#6)
Clan: =|^|=    Hells Militia (#881)
Clan: Armada    Guerilla Strike
2330 Acres

Unrelated but similar--the "turns were stopped" came up and only charged me 1 turn on an espionage.

Well I don't know precisely what happened, but I lost all 18 of my Reg cities and it never displayed a dialogue of losing the land orcities. I had a number of failures from #288 preceeding it and then checked (18 cities cost a HELL of a lot of money to destroy) where they went. I don't have them, he doesn't have them either.

3 hours ago     You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) attempting to view your army!
3 hours ago    Obscurum in Oriens (#288) attacked you!    Your enemy captured 821 Acres of Land and destroyed:
32,093 Rats
241,768 Leaders
You managed to destroy:
64,105 Rats
3 hours ago    Obscurum in Oriens (#288) attacked you!    Your enemy captured 503 Acres of Land and destroyed:
23,114 Rats
232,096 Leaders
You managed to destroy:
37,868 Rats
3 hours ago    Obscurum in Oriens (#288) attacked you!    Your enemy captured 1447 Acres of Land and destroyed:
803 Rats
55,703 Leaders
You managed to destroy:
9,166 Rats
3 hours ago    Obscurum in Oriens (#288) attacked you!    Your enemy captured 291 Acres of Land and destroyed:
16 Rats
165,438 Leaders
You managed to destroy:
994 Rats
3 hours ago    Obscurum in Oriens (#288) attacked you!    Your enemy captured 960 Acres of Land and destroyed:
106,984 Leaders
You managed to destroy:
1 Rats
3 hours ago    Obscurum in Oriens (#288) attacked you!    Your enemy captured 72 Acres of Land and destroyed:
104,844 Leaders
You managed to destroy:
3 hours ago    Obscurum in Oriens (#288) attacked you!    Your enemy captured 2027 Acres of Land and destroyed:
102,748 Leaders
You managed to destroy:
2 Rats
3 hours ago    Obscurum in Oriens (#288) attacked you!    Your enemy captured 1623 Acres of Land and destroyed:
50,346 Leaders
You managed to destroy:
3 hours ago    Obscurum in Oriens (#288) attacked you!    Your enemy captured 909 Acres of Land and destroyed:
199,372 Leaders
You managed to destroy:
2 Rats
3 hours ago    Obscurum in Oriens (#288) attacked you!    Your enemy captured 467 Acres of Land and destroyed:
143,547 Leaders
You managed to destroy:
1 Rats
3 hours ago    You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
0 Workers
3 hours ago    You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
46,414 Leaders
0 Workers
3 hours ago    You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
45,950 Leaders
18,681 Workers
3 hours ago    You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
45,490 Leaders
18,494 Workers
3 hours ago    You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
45,036 Leaders
0 Workers
3 hours ago    You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
0 Workers
3 hours ago    You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
89,170 Leaders
18,309 Workers
3 hours ago    You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
87,387 Leaders
18,126 Workers
3 hours ago    You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
0 Workers
3 hours ago    You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
17,945 Workers
3 hours ago    You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
42,820 Leaders
17,766 Workers
3 hours ago    You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
0 Workers
3 hours ago    You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
0 Workers
3 hours ago    You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
42,391 Leaders
0 Workers
3 hours ago    You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
41,968 Leaders
0 Workers
3 hours ago    You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
83,096 Leaders
17,588 Workers
3 hours ago    You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
0 Workers
3 hours ago    You find Obscurum in Oriens (#288) failing to capture one of your cities.    In the battle, you lost:
0 Leaders
0 Workers
2.1 hours ago    Obscurum in Oriens (#288) attacked you!    Your enemy captured 1043 Acres of Land and destroyed:
162,864 Leaders
You managed to destroy:
4 Rats
2.1 hours ago    Obscurum in Oriens (#288) attacked you!    Your enemy captured 1105 Acres of Land and destroyed:
39,088 Leaders
You managed to destroy:
2 Rats
2.1 hours ago    Obscurum in Oriens (#288) attacked you!    Your enemy captured 40 Acres of Land and destroyed:
38,697 Leaders
You managed to destroy:
2.1 hours ago    Obscurum in Oriens (#288) attacked you!    Your enemy captured 1327 Acres of Land and destroyed:
You managed to destroy:
2.1 hours ago    Obscurum in Oriens (#288) attacked you!    Your enemy captured 767 Acres of Land and destroyed:
38,310 Leaders
You managed to destroy:
3 Rats
2.1 hours ago    Obscurum in Oriens (#288) attacked you!    Your enemy captured 978 Acres of Land and destroyed:
113,781 Leaders
You managed to destroy:
3 Rats

Two things to say...

1) Glitch much?
2) Can I get 18 cities back since they disappeared?

My grandpa's on his death bed. I'm going to see him. I'll be back whenever. Till then, aidos.

Mods/Admins: Move if necessary--I don't know where it belongs and at this moment I don't care.

 :D

Ok, not really though I did have a bit of fun organizing it.

Behold:
3     ?     iluvashley (#717)     90,625     $506,090,193     Wrath (War)     Stoat     Southsward

iluvashley (#717)
Turns (?)     250 (max 450)
Turns Stored (?)     24 (max 150)
Rank (?)     #1
Workers (?)     246,479
Acres (?)     90,625
Cash (?)     $41,539,790,398
Food (?)     2,443,536,588
Loyalty (?)     8,387,533
Networth (?)     $2,123,619,175
           
Location (?)     Southsward
Race (?)     Stoat
Health (?)     100%
Tax Rate (?)     11%
Rats (?)     559,519
Weasels (?)     571,360
Stoats (?)     76,470,590
Skiffs (?)     282,344,723
Leaders (?)     5,124,337

5     ?     Avatar of Pain (#243)     40,237     $473,792,696     Wrath (War)     Rat     Northlands

Avatar of Pain (#243) 
Turns (?) 450 (max 450) 
Turns Stored (?) 150 (max 150) 
Rank (?) #3 
Workers (?) 217,832 
Acres (?) 40,237 
Cash (?) $110,947,181,582 
Food (?) 462,061,172 
Loyalty (?) 26,703,826 
Networth (?) $1,042,269,694 
  Location (?) Northlands 
Race (?) Rat 
Health (?) 100% 
Tax Rate (?) 11% 
Rats (?) 53,701 
Weasels (?) 40,855 
Stoats (?) 48,838,929 
Skiffs (?) 126,200,000 (or so--forgot to copy exact prior)
Leaders (?) 68,406

Well, it was fun. Cut free 75% of Iluvashley's NW and 50% of Alazar's NW. ;) Thanks to my friends and allies of course as well.

http://xkcd.com/370/

:D

Some of my allies and friends will know about this. Anyways--attached is a piece of evidence from a few of your fellow players (Shade, Alazar, possibly others). What is this evidence? Is it real? Why would Bob-sama ever betray his allies like that?



So what's that say? Other than the obvious, it says that the person who took the screenshot had been using Internet Explorer 7 to make it. The window had to have been resized, so that the lines in that screenshot and the delete button are aligned. Do note that there is no timestamp on it--meaning no visible date of origin, no time of origin, and no way to really know when this was taken. Please, also note that the style of writing is incorrect. Had I been writing that, you would have seen my "signature" grammar--the over-use of "--", in that message would have likely been separating the first and second lines. Plenty of other places that the evidence would simply not hold water. Consider that there are no other messages from me contained in the screenshot, only that one message. If it had been from me, ever, it would not be present in that form on the current Turbo server.

Note a few other things as well--it's a JPG image that has been saved a few times--I'd estimate 3-4x prior by how distorted it has become. Now then--where's the problem? Is it true? Why is Bob-sama posting something that would harm him?

In short--because it's a fake. It's forged. It's not real--I didn't send that and admins can vouch for that fact. On the other hand--the message was sent. The message was to someone else. The difference is that the message was NOT from Bob-sama (#6).

[13:53] Bob: hi
[13:53] Shael (RWL): hey
[13:53] Bob: question...
[13:53] Bob: can you search the mail system for a particular piece of mail?
[13:53] Shael (RWL): i did
[13:53] Bob: Shade & Co are trying some fun slander
[13:53] Bob: nothing turned up?
[13:54] Bob: or did something turn up?
[13:54] Shael (RWL): i did see the message on the turbo system
[13:55] Bob: where?
[13:55] Bob: and from/to whom?
[13:55] Shael (RWL): it was not sent by you
[13:55] Shael (RWL): that's all i can say
[13:55] Bob: ok
...
[13:58] Bob: i didn't remember ever writing it
[14:00] Shael (RWL): yeah
[14:00] Shael (RWL): that's photoshopped
[14:01] Shael (RWL): cause it's not from you
[14:01] Bob: yeah--I know

So now--I have to thank those that forged it. Why? Because you're making yourselves out much worse than you could POSSIBLY make me--that you try to break up a team by forging evidence.

Thank you Shael for searching the system and being able to verify that it is in fact forged,

-Bob-sama-

Black Smokes dead will net you $125b cash.

Bounty effective immediately on Turbo. Cash delivery within 3 days, as I'm making my recovery.

How about anonymous attacks? Basically base it off of stealing--that you can not see the person attacking unless they fail, and identities are only displayed on the recent attacks, such on warlord pages. I think it would make a more-interesting, if not more-aggressive, game. Onlining would still be seen and countered accurately (you can still click your own warlord's page and see the attacker), but anyone can still grab without some new person thinking you're declaring war on them. Make more effort to really retaliate. Alternatively, join this idea into the no-leaders theme.

Comments? Yay? Nay?

Bob-sama (#20)
Clan:
Saladin (#69)
Clan: Earth

Mission: Move South
Failed

I tried the Take mission, but it failed and displayed this message. I know why I failed too, but still that is a bit weird.

EDIT: Also...

Bob-sama (#20)
Clan:    
Saladin (#69)
Clan: Earth    

Mission: Move South
1000 Acres

It worked, but is still labeled incorrectly, regardless of success/failure.

Time     Event
0.1 hours ago    You find another warlord viewing your stats!
0.1 hours ago    Someone stole $1,123,890,903 from your treasury!
0.1 hours ago    Someone stole $1,211,095,634 from your treasury!
0.1 hours ago    Someone stole $907,032,386 from your treasury!
0.1 hours ago    Someone stole $815,451,229 from your treasury!
0.1 hours ago    Someone stole $691,903,647 from your treasury!
0.1 hours ago    Someone stole $658,355,859 from your treasury!
0.1 hours ago    Your Leaders were defeated by Feng Kestrel (#552) and you lost 948 Acres of Land!    You lost 195 Leaders, but you managed to kill 3306 of your attacker's Leaders.
0.1 hours ago    Your Leaders were defeated by Feng Kestrel (#552) and you lost 779 Acres of Land!    You lost 227 Leaders, but you managed to kill 4648 of your attacker's Leaders.
0.1 hours ago    Your Leaders were defeated by Feng Kestrel (#552) and you lost 878 Acres of Land!    You lost 368 Leaders, but you managed to kill 4745 of your attacker's Leaders.
0.1 hours ago    Your Leaders were defeated by Feng Kestrel (#552) and you lost 3681 Acres of Land!    You lost 24 Leaders, but you managed to kill 2775 of your attacker's Leaders.
0 hours ago    You find another warlord viewing your stats!


In short, I was online'd by Feng. Why? Because I grabbed some land off of Wise Claw. Last time I checked, grabbing land is not a bad thing to do--afterall, we all need to spend those turns. Furthermore, I was being threatened not to grab off of someone who had about 56k land--and was at my rank. A fox by the name of Wise Claw. Of course I'm not going to listen to some BS such as that--especially when Wise Claw had about 2x the land as anyone else near their rank.

I'm not saying go off and kill Feng, but I will say that Feng was very much in the wrong.