Hi all, I'm pretty new and am having trouble grasping the whole "etiquette" part of this game.
My current annoyance, in particular, is the instructions given to other players on various warlords' noticeboards. I'm talking about things such as "don't hit me below ___k land, or "don't use these troops".
The most viewed ingame page is the scores page, in which warlords are RANKED, this would seem to infer that RWL is, in fact, a COMPETITIVE game. May I ask since when, in competition, was it acceptable for competitors to dictate to others the manner in which they can compete, for their own advancement.
This also applies to so-called "passive" or "peaceful" players. This game is about WARlords, it is not passive or peaceful, and players should not be able to dictate it to be. I have annoyed a few of these players in my short time in the game, but I'm not too phased - they don't attack me back :P
P.S. I play indy, so I would prefer it if no one leaders me, or knocks me below 50k land. Ok thanks guys!
My current annoyance, in particular, is the instructions given to other players on various warlords' noticeboards. I'm talking about things such as "don't hit me below ___k land, or "don't use these troops".
The most viewed ingame page is the scores page, in which warlords are RANKED, this would seem to infer that RWL is, in fact, a COMPETITIVE game. May I ask since when, in competition, was it acceptable for competitors to dictate to others the manner in which they can compete, for their own advancement.
This also applies to so-called "passive" or "peaceful" players. This game is about WARlords, it is not passive or peaceful, and players should not be able to dictate it to be. I have annoyed a few of these players in my short time in the game, but I'm not too phased - they don't attack me back :P
P.S. I play indy, so I would prefer it if no one leaders me, or knocks me below 50k land. Ok thanks guys!